The Sociology of Refugee Migration

Literature Cited

1. Abdi CM 2015. Elusive Jannah: The Somali Diaspora and a Borderless Muslim Identity Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abrego LJ 2017. On silences: Salvadoran refugees then and now. Lat. Stud. 15:173–85
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adhikari P 2013. Conflict-induced displacement, understanding the causes of flight. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:182–89
   [Google Scholar]
4. Akram SM 2002. Palestinian refugees and their legal status: rights, politics, and implications for a just solution. J. Palest. Stud. 31:336–51
   [Google Scholar]
5. Al-Ali N, Black R, Koser K 2001. The limits to “transnationalism”: Bosnian and Eritrean refugees in Europe as emerging transnational communities. Ethn. Racial Stud. 24:4578–600
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alba R, Nee V 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Alvarado SE, Massey DS 2010. In search of peace: structural adjustment, violence, and international migration. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 630:1137–61
   [Google Scholar]
8. Amuedo-Dorantes C, Puttitanun T 2016. DACA and the surge in unaccompanied minors at the US-Mexico border. Int. Migr. 54:4102–17
   [Google Scholar]
9. Andersson R 2014. Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe. Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
   [Google Scholar]
10. Arango J, Mahía R, Moya D, Sánchez-Montijano E 2016. Introducción: el año de los refugiados. Anuario CIDOB de la Inmigración CIDOB 12–26 Barcelona: CIDOB
    [Google Scholar]
11. Arar R 2016. How political migrants’ networks differ from those of economic migrants: “strategic anonymity” among Iraqi refugees in Jordan. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 42:3519–35
    [Google Scholar]
12. Arar R 2017. The new grand compromise: how Syrian refugees changed the stakes in the global refugee assistance regime. Middle East Law Gov 9:3298–312
    [Google Scholar]
13. Arendt H 1968. The Origins of Totalitarianism New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bakewell O 2000. Repatriation and self-settled refugees in Zambia: bringing solutions to the wrong problems. J. Refug. Stud. 13:4356–73
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bakewell O, de Haas H, Agnieszka K 2012. Migration systems, pioneer migrants and the role of agency. J. Crit. Realism 11:4413–37
    [Google Scholar]
16. Banki S 2016. Transnational activism as practised by activists from Burma: negotiating precarity, mobility and resistance. Metamorphosis: Studies in Social and Political Change in Myanmar R Egreteau, F Robinne 234–59 Singapore: Natl. Univ. Singap. Press
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bean F, Brown S, Bachmeier J 2015. Parents Without Papers: The Progress and Pitfalls of Mexican American Integration New York: Russell: Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Belloni M 2016. Refugees as gamblers: Eritreans seeking to migrate through Italy. J. Immigr. Refug. Stud. 14:1104–19
    [Google Scholar]
19. Betts A 2013. Survival Migration: Failed Governance and the Crisis of Displacement Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
20. Betts A, Collier P 2017. Refuge: Transforming a Broken Refugee System London: Allen Lane
    [Google Scholar]
21. Black R 2001. Fifty years of refugee studies: from theory to policy. Int. Migr. Rev. 35:157–78
    [Google Scholar]
22. Black R, Koser K 1999. The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction New York: Berghahn Books
    [Google Scholar]
23. Bloemraad I 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Bohra-Mishra P, Massey DS 2011. Individual decisions to migrate during civil conflict. Demography 48:2401–24
    [Google Scholar]
25. Bourdieu P 1991. Language and Symbolic Power Malden, MA: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
26. Brubaker R, Cooper F 2000. Beyond “identity. Theor. Soc. 29:11–47
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bylander M 2015. Depending on the sky: environmental distress, migration, and coping in rural Cambodia. Int. Migr. 53:5135–47
    [Google Scholar]
28. Castles S 2003. Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology 37:113–34
    [Google Scholar]
29. Chatelard G 2010. What visibility conceals: re-embedding refugee migration from Iraq. Dispossession and Displacement: Forced Migration in the Middle East and Africa D Chatty, B Finlayson 17–44 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chimni BS 1998. The global refugee problem in the 21st century and the emerging security paradigm: a disturbing trend. Legal Visions of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher Weeramantry A Anghie, G Sturgess 283–99 The Hague, Neth.: Kluwer Law Int.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Chimni BS 2009. The birth of a “discipline”: from refugee to forced migration studies. J. Refug. Stud. 22:111–29
    [Google Scholar]
32. CIA (Cent. Intell. Agency). 1967. Views [redacted] on the refugee problem CIA Intell. Inf. Cable, July 14. https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000096584.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
33. Clemens MA 2017. Evaluating evaluations: violence, development, and migration waves: evidence from Central American child migrant apprehensions Work. Pap. 459, Cent. Glob. Dev Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
34. Colic-Peisker V, Tilbury F 2003. “Active” and “passive” resettlement: the influence of support services and refugees’ own resources on resettlement style. Int. Migr. 41:561–91
    [Google Scholar]
35. Collyer M, Düvell F, de Haas H 2012. Critical approaches to transit migration. Popul. Space Place 18:407–14
    [Google Scholar]
36. Commonw. Aust. 2014. Migration Amendment (protecting babies born in Australia) Bill 2014 Rep. Senate Leg. Const. Aff. Legis. Comm., Canberra, Aust. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Protecting_Babies/∼/media/Committees/legcon_ctte/Protecting_Babies/report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. Crawley H, Duvell F, Sigona N, McMahon S, Jones K 2016. Unpacking a rapidly changing scenario: migration flows, routes and trajectories across the Mediterranean Res. Brief 1, MEDMIG, Coventry Univ. Coventry, UK: http://www.medmig.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/MEDMIG-Briefing-01-March-2016-FINAL-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
38. Crawley H, Skleparis D 2018. Refugees, migrants, neither, both: categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe's “migration crisis. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 44:148–64
    [Google Scholar]
39. Crisp J 1999. “Who has counted the refugees?” UNHCR and the politics of numbers Work. Pap. 12, New Issues Refug. Res., Policy Res. Unit, UNHCR, Geneva
    [Google Scholar]
40. Cuéllar MF 2006. Refugee security and the organizational logic of legal mandates. Georgetown J. Int. Law 37:4583–723
    [Google Scholar]
41. Davenport C, Moore W, Poe S 2003. Sometimes you just have to leave: domestic threats and forced migration, 1964–1989. Int. Interact. 29:127–55
    [Google Scholar]
42. Day K, White P 2002. Choice or circumstance: the UK as the location of asylum applications by Bosnian and Somali refugees. GeoJournal 56:115–26
    [Google Scholar]
43. De Bel-Air F 2015. A note on Syrian refugees in the Gulf: attempting to assess data and policies Explan. Note 11/2015, Gulf Labour Mark. Migr. Prog., Gulf Res. Cen., Geneva, Switz. http://gulfmigration.eu/media/pubs/exno/GLMM_EN_2015_11.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
44. De Wet CJ 2006. Development-Induced Displacement: Problems, Policies, and People New York: Berghahn Books
    [Google Scholar]
45. Espiritu YL 2014. Body Counts: The Vietnam War and Militarized Refugees Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fein H 1993. Accounting for genocide after 1945: theories and some findings. Int. J. Group Rights 1:279–106
    [Google Scholar]
47. Feller E 2005. Refugees are not migrants. Refug. Surv. Q. 24:427–35
    [Google Scholar]
48. FitzGerald DS 2019. Refuge Beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
49. FitzGerald DS 2014. The sociology of international migration. Migration Theory: Talking Across Disciplines JF Hollifield, CB Brettell 115–47 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
50. FitzGerald DS, Cook-Martín D 2014. Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
51. Frezzo M 2015. The Sociology of Human Rights: An Introduction Malden, MA: Polity Press
    [Google Scholar]
52. Galli C 2017. A rite of reverse passage: the construction of youth migration in the US asylum process. Ethn. Racial Stud. In press. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1310389
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Gammeltoft-Hansen T, Sørensen NN 2013. The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gatrell P 2013. The Making of the Modern Refugee Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Geiger M, Pécoud A 2010. The Politics of International Migration Management London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
56. Gibney MJ 2004. The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
57. Gladstone R 2017. Displaced population hit record in '16, U.N. says. New York Times, June 19. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/19/world/middleeast/displaced-people-united-nations-global-trends.html
58. Goffman E 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates New York: Random House
    [Google Scholar]
59. Goodwin-Gill G, McAdam J 2007. The Refugee in International Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
60. Gray B 2016. Exile, refuge and the Greek polis: between justice and humanity. J. Refug. Stud. 30:2190–219
    [Google Scholar]
61. Greenhill KM 2010. Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
62. Haddad E 2008. The Refugee in International Society: Between Sovereigns Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hamlin R 2014. Let Me Be a Refugee: Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hamlin R 2017. Migrant Categories in Crisis Presented at Cent. Study Int. Migr., Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hansen R 2009. The poverty of postnationalism: citizenship, immigration, and the new Europe. Theor. Soc. 38:11–24
    [Google Scholar]
66. Hathaway JC 2007. Forced migration studies: Could we agree just to “date. J. Refug. Stud. 20:3349–69
    [Google Scholar]
67. Hein J 1993. Refugees, immigrants, and the state. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 19:43–59
    [Google Scholar]
68. Hiskey JT, Córdova A, Orcés D, Malone MF 2016. Understanding the Central American refugee crisis: why they are fleeing and how U.S. policies are failing to deter them Spec. Rep., Am. Immigr. Counc. Washington, DC: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/understanding_the_central_american_refugee_crisis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
69. Holzer E 2015. The Concerned Women of Buduburam: Refugee Activists and Humanitarian Dilemmas Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Hyndman J, Giles W 2017. Refugees in Extended Exile: Living on the Edge New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
71. Içduygu A 2000. The politics of international migratory regimes: transit migration flows in Turkey. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 52:165357–67
    [Google Scholar]
72. Jacobsen K 2006. Refugees and asylum seekers in urban areas: a livelihoods perspective. J. Refug. Stud. 19:3273–86
    [Google Scholar]
73. Jászi O 1939. Political refugees. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 203:183–93
    [Google Scholar]
74. Jupp J 2002. From White Australia to Woomera: The Story of Australian Immigration Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
75. Juran S, Broer PN 2017. A profile of Germany's refugee populations. Popul. Dev. Rev. 43:1149–57
    [Google Scholar]
76. Kagan M 2012. The UN “surrogate state” and the foundation of refugee policy in the Middle East. Sch. Works 18:2307–28
    [Google Scholar]
77. Karatani R 2005. How history separated refugee and migrant regimes: in search of their institutional origins. Int. J. Refug. Law 17:3517–41
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kelley N, Trebilcock MJ 2010. The Making of the Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
    [Google Scholar]
79. Koser K 1997. Social networks and the asylum cycle: the case of Iranians in the Netherlands. Int. Migr. Rev. 31:3591–611
    [Google Scholar]
80. Koser K 2007. Refugees, transnationalism and the state. J. Ethnic Migr. Stud. 33:2233–54
    [Google Scholar]
81. Koser K, Martin S 2011. The Migration-Displacement Nexus: Patterns, Processes, and Policies New York: Berghahn Books
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lanphier M 2003. Sponsorship: organizational, sponsor, and refugee perspectives. J. Int. Migr. Integr. 4:2237–56
    [Google Scholar]
83. Loescher G 2001. The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
84. Long K 2013. When refugees stopped being migrants: movement, labour and humanitarian protection. Migr. Stud. 1:14–26
    [Google Scholar]
85. Louie A 2013. International adoption. Routledge International Handbook of Migration Studies S Gold, S Nawyn 319–30 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ludwig B 2016. “Wiping the refugee dust from my feet”: advantages and burdens of refugee status and the refugee label. Int. Migr. 54:15–18
    [Google Scholar]
87. Luthra R, Soehl T, Waldinger R 2017. Reconceptualizing context: a multilevel model of the context of reception and second-generation educational attainment. Int. Migr. Rev. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12315
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
88. Madokoro L 2016. Elusive Refuge: Chinese Migrants in the Cold War Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
89. Malkki LH 1995. Refugees and exile: from “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:495–523
    [Google Scholar]
90. Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A, Taylor JE 1998. Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
91. Mazur RE 1988. Refugees in Africa: the role of sociological analysis and praxis. Curr. Sociol. 36:243–60
    [Google Scholar]
92. McAdam J 2012. Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
93. McSherry BM, Kneebone SY 2008. Trafficking in women and forced migration: moving victims across the border of crime into the domain of human rights. Int. J. Hum. Rights 12:167–87
    [Google Scholar]
94. Melander E, Öberg M 2006. Time to go? Duration dependence in force migration. Int. Interact. 32:2129–52
    [Google Scholar]
95. Menjívar C 2000. Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
96. Mooney E 2005. The concept of internal displacement and the case for internally displaced persons as a category of concern. Refug. Surv. Q. 24:29–26
    [Google Scholar]
97. Moore WH, Shellman SM 2007. Whither will they go? A global study of refugees’ destinations, 1965–1995. Int. Stud. Q. 51:4811–34
    [Google Scholar]
98. Morawska E 2004. Exploring diversity in immigrant assimilation and transnationalism: Poles and Russian Jews in Philadelphia. Int. Migr. Rev. 38:41372–412
    [Google Scholar]
99. Moret J, Baglioni S, Efionayi-Mäder D 2006. The Path of Somali Refugees into Exile: A Comparative Analysis of Secondary Movements and Policy Responses Neuchatel: Swiss Forum Migr. Popul. Stud.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Morrison AR, May RA 1994. Escape from terror: violence and migration in post-revolutionary Guatemala. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 29:2111–32
     [Google Scholar]
101. Motomura H 2006. Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
102. Mountz A 2010. Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
103. Nature 2017. Data on movements of refugees and migrants are flawed. Nature 543:76435–6
     [Google Scholar]
104. Nawyn SJ 2011. “I have so many successful stories”: framing social citizenship for refugees. Citizsh. Stud. 15:6–7679–93
     [Google Scholar]
105. Neumann K 2015. Across the Seas: Australia's Response to Refugees: A History Collingwood, Aust.: Black Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Neumayer E 2005. Bogus refugees? The determinants of asylum migration to Western Europe. Int. Stud. Q. 49:3389–410
     [Google Scholar]
107. Nobles J, McKelvey C 2015. Gender, power, and emigration from Mexico. Demography 52:51573–600
     [Google Scholar]
108. Orchard P 2014. A Right to Flee: Refugees, States, and the Construction of International Cooperation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
109. Pavanello S, Elhawary S, Pantuliano S 2010. Hidden and exposed: urban refugees in Nairobi, Kenya Work. Pap., Humanit. Policy Group Overseas Dev. Inst. London:
     [Google Scholar]
110. Pedraza-Bailey S 1985. Cuba's exiles: portrait of a refugee migration. Int. Migr. Rev. 19:14–34
     [Google Scholar]
111. Petersen W 1958. A general typology of migration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 23:3256–66
     [Google Scholar]
112. Piore MJ 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
113. Portes A 1995. The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship New York: Russell: Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Portes A, Bach RL 1985. Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
115. Portes A, Rumbaut RG 2014. Immigrant America: A Portrait Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
116. Portes A, Walton J 1981. Labor, Class, and the International System New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
117. Rajaram PK 2002. Humanitarianism and representations of the refugee. J. Refug. Stud. 15:3247–64
     [Google Scholar]
118. Richmond AH 1988. Sociological theories of international migration: the case of refugees. Curr. Sociol. 36:27–25
     [Google Scholar]
119. Roucek JS 1939. Minorities—a basis of the refugee problem. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 203:1–17
     [Google Scholar]
120. Satzewich V 1991. Racism and the Incorporation of Foreign Labour: Farm Labour Migration to Canada since 1945 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
121. Scalettaris G 2007. Refugee studies and the international refugee regime: a reflection on a desirable separation. Refug. Surv. Q. 26:336–50
     [Google Scholar]
122. Schmeidl S 1997. Exploring the causes of forced migration: a pooled time-series analysis, 1971–1990. Soc. Sci. Q. 78:2284–308
     [Google Scholar]
123. Scott JC 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
124. Shacknove AE 1985. Who is a refugee. Ethics 95:2274–84
     [Google Scholar]
125. Silva AC, Massey DS 2015. Violence, networks, and international migration from Colombia. Int. Migr. 53:5162–78
     [Google Scholar]
126. Simpson JH 1939. The Refugee Problem: Report of a Survey London: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
127. Skran C, Daughtry CN 2007. The study of refugees before “refugee studies. Refug. Surv. Q. 26:315–35
     [Google Scholar]
128. Soysal YN 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
129. Stahn C 2007. Responsibility to protect: political rhetoric or emerging legal norm. Am. J. Int. Law 101:199–120
     [Google Scholar]
130. Stanley WD 1987. Economic migrants or refugees from violence? A time-series analysis of Salvadoran migration to the United States. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 22:1132–54
     [Google Scholar]
131. Stark O 1991. The Migration of Labor Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
132. Steele A 2009. Seeking safety: avoiding displacement and choosing destinations in civil wars. J. Peace Res. 46:3419–30
     [Google Scholar]
133. Stein BN, Cuny FC 1994. Refugee repatriation during conflict: protection and post-return assistance. Dev. Pract. 4:3173–87
     [Google Scholar]
134. Stepputat F, Sørensen NN 2014. Sociology and forced migration. The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies E Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G Loescher, K Long, N Sigona 86–98 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
135. Stoessinger JG 1956. The Refugee and the World Community Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
136. Suhrke A, Klink F 1987. Contrasting patterns of Asian refugee movements: the Vietnamese and Afghan syndromes. Cent. Migr. Stud. Spec. Issues 5:385–102
     [Google Scholar]
137. Sullivan D, Tobin SA 2014. Security and resilience among Syrian refugees in Jordan. Middle East Res. Inf. Proj. Oct. 14. http://merip.org/mero/mero101414
     [Google Scholar]
138. Todaro MP 1969. A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 59:1138–48
     [Google Scholar]
139. Turton D 1996. Migrants and refugees: a Mursi case study. Search of Cool Ground: War, Flight and Homecoming in Northeast Africa T Allen 96–110 Asmara, Eritrea: Afr. World Press
     [Google Scholar]
140. UNHCR. 2011. Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status: Under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees Geneva: UNHCR
     [Google Scholar]
141. UNHCR. 2017. Global trends: forced displacement in 2016 Rep., UNHCR Geneva: http://www.unhcr.org/5943e8a34.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
142. UNICEF. 2017. Children on the move in Italy and Greece Rep., REACH, UNICEF, New York. https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/children-move-italy-and-greece
     [Google Scholar]
143. Van Hear N 2006. Refugees in diaspora: from durable solutions to transnational relations. Refuge 23:19–14
     [Google Scholar]
144. Van Hear N 2012. Forcing the issue: migration crises and the uneasy dialogue between refugee research and policy. J. Refug. Stud. 25:12–24
     [Google Scholar]
145. Vogler M, Rotte R 2000. The effects of development on migration: theoretical issues and new empirical evidence. J. Popul. Econ. 13:3485–508
     [Google Scholar]
146. Wahlbeck Ö 2002. The concept of diaspora as an analytical tool in the study of refugee communities. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 28:2221–38
     [Google Scholar]
147. Waldinger R, Fitzgerald D 2004. Transnationalism in question. Am. J. Sociol. 109:51177–95
     [Google Scholar]
148. Werker E 2007. Refugee camp economies. J. Refug. Stud. 20:3461–80
     [Google Scholar]
149. Williams L 2006. Social networks of refugees in the United Kingdom: tradition, tactics and new community spaces. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 32:5865–79
     [Google Scholar]
150. Zetter R 2007. More labels, fewer refugees: remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. J. Refug. Stud. 20:2172–92
     [Google Scholar]
151. Zetter R, Deikun G 2010. Meeting humanitarian challenges in urban areas. Forced Migr. Rev. 34:5–7
     [Google Scholar]
152. Zhou M, Bankston C 1998. Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States New York: Russell: Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
153. Zimmermann SE 2009. Irregular secondary movements to Europe: seeking asylum beyond refuge. J. Refug. Stud. 22:174–96
     [Google Scholar]
154. Zolberg AR, Suhrke A, Aguayo S 1989. Escape from Violence: Conflict and the Refugee Crisis in the Developing World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
155. Zucker NL, Zucker NF 1989. The uneasy troika in US refugee policy: foreign policy, pressure groups, and resettlement costs. J. Refug. Stud. 2:3359–72
     [Google Scholar]